Home / Number of ways to choose 2 distinct positions for R’s from those \( < m \)? No: we need R’s chosen from positions 1 to \( m-1 \), but no: since max R must be < m, so R’s ∈ {1,2,...,m−1}, and we choose 2 of them: number is \(\binom{m-1}{2}\) if \( m-1 \geq 2 \), else 0.
Related Articles Let \( m = \max(\text{R positions}) \), \( n = \min(\text{L positions}) \), require \( m < n \) Now, \( m \geq 2 \), \( n \leq 5 - m \), but \( n > m \), and \( n \geq m+1 \) So for each \( m = 2,3,4 \), and \( n = m+1, m+2, \dots, 5 \), we count: Number of ways to choose 2 distinct positions for L’s from positions \( \geq n \), and \( n \leq 5 \), so from {n, n+1, ..., 5}, which has size \( 5 - n + 1 \), and we choose 2: \(\binom{6 - n}{2}\), provided \( 6 - n \geq 2 \), i.e., \( n \leq 4 \) And T goes to the remaining position. Now compute for each \( m \):
Trending Articles Wait — perhaps I made error in area. Alternative: maybe the inner area is 240, so solve numerically: Let x = 0.9: (20-1.8)=18.2, (15-1.8)=13.2, 18.2×13.2 = 240.24 ≈ 240 (close enough for company fence). x=0.91: 19.18×13.08≈250.2 — worse. So x≈0.9. But 18.2×13.2= let's compute: 18×13.2=237.6, 0.2×13.2=2.64, total 240.24. x=0.89: 19.22×13.22≈19.22×13.2=252.636, minus 19.22×0.02≈0.384, so 252.252 — too high. Try x=0.92: 19.16×12.96≈19.16×13=249.08, minus 19.16×0.04≈0.766, so ~248.3 — too low. Wait, 20-1.84=18.16, 15-1.84=13.16, 18.16×13.16. 18×13.16=236.88, 0.16×13.16≈2.1056, total 238.985 — less than 240. So between 0.89 and 0.9.
Top